TiltAz Mounted Antenna

John Bunton CSIRO Telecommunications and Industrial Physics, Australia john.bunton@tip.csiro.au

 

Abstract

It is almost certain that SKA antennas will need mechanical motion of some type to achieve full sky coverage for frequencies above 1GHz.  A wheel on track azimuth rotator is a low-cost and low-maintenance option for providing this motion around one axis.

 

Use of an azimuth rotator leads naturally to the TiltAz antenna mount proposed in this paper.  Any type of antenna that can provide 900 of scanning in the elevation plane will give full-sky coverage with this mount.  This includes cylindrical reflectors and arrays of parabolic reflectors or Luneburg lenses.  For the latter, the TiltAz mount allows close-to-filled aperture designs which increase the field of view and eliminate grating lobes.

 

The Mechanical Imperative

It is generally conceded that phased arrays are uneconomic much beyond a frequency of 1GHz and for most designs suitable for the SKA the number of mechanical drives exceeds 7,000.

→ SKA antennas will have mechanical motion and we must minimise maintenance costs

This can be done by –

¨       Reducing the number to be maintained

¨       Reducing the cost of maintaining each mechanical component

¨       Increasing reliability

The first two methods of reducing cost tend to work in opposing directions.  Consider parabolic reflectors: replacing components on a small reflector is much easier than on large dishes.  On a larger reflector, elevation bearing replacement may need weeks of work compared to only hours on a small reflector.  But in terms of time per unit of collecting area the difference is small.  Instead

→Choose designs that are inherently easy to maintain

→Wheel on Track Azimuth rotator

This provides

¨       ground level access;

¨       mechanical components are easy to replace.

The need for the last point was impressed on the author after replacing the HA drive pinion on a 14m diameter dish. 

 

TiltAz Antenna Mount

The antenna on an azimuth rotator need only scan in elevation by ±450 around 450.  Maximum sky coverage is achieved by tilting the antenna to the preferred look direction of 450.  For such designs the resulting antenna can be called a Tilted antenna on an Azimuth mount or TiltAz mounted antenna.

 

The choice of antenna to mount on an azimuth rotator is very large and includes–

¨       Electronically scanned phased arrays and cylindrical reflectors (eg doublet  as in Figure 1)

¨       Feed scanned spherical reflectors, Luneburg lenses and R‑KR lenses

¨       Mechanically scanned parabolic reflectors (AltAz mount)

¨      Arrays of any of the above

 

Cylindrical and Spherical Reflector TiltAz Antennas

An existing cylindrical reflector TiltAz antenna is the doublet[1] which provides a large field of view and effective area at low cost.  Alternatively, using a spherical reflector trades aperture efficiency for a reduction in the number of feeds, and allows operation to 22 GHz.  For both designs, the surface can be made very stable because of the box-like nature of the backing structure and the lack of varying gravitational distortion.


 


Figure 1   The Doublet or Dual Offset Cylindrical Reflector TiltAz antenna

 


Arrayed Reflector or Lens TiltAz Antenna

Arrays of reflectors or lenses suffer from a very low filling factor if they are to observe sources at low elevations.  Mounting such arrays on a TiltAz mount can increase the filling (also proposed by Weinreb[2]).  As the whole antenna rotates for azimuth steering, the individual antennas can be close packed horizontally.  In the orthogonal direction along the tilted plane the antennas can be packed with 80% efficiency.  An example is shown in Figure 2.


 

 


Figure 2  Diagram showing general arrangement of parabolic reflectors or Luneburg lenses on a TiltAz mount

Text Box: ¨	Arraying without grating lobes in the main beam
¨	Array station size antennas with filled apertures
¨	No shadowing at any elevations
¨	High resistance to winds, low  profile and wide base 
¨	Possibility of common mechanical drive, along each row of small elements 
And for Luneburg lenses–
¨	Approximately 30% instantaneous sky coverage achievable
¨	Allows the option of using smaller lenses while maintaining viable low frequency operation giving 
·	Reduced total mass
·	Increased higher frequency capabilities 
The advantages of arrays on a TiltAz mount are–



[1] James, G.L., and Parfitt, A.J., in Perspectives on Radio Astronomy: Technologies for Large Antenna Arrays, (eds) Smolders & van Haarlem, Dwingeloo, 1999.

[2] The parabolic reflector array TiltAz was independently proposed by S. Weinreb as the Multi Reflector Turntable.