Cylindrical Antenna for aA
simplified figure of merit (FOM) is described which allows a direct comparison
between the number of detectable extra-terrestrial civilisations at a given
transmit power for different antennas.
The small beam size of large parabolic reflectors precludes all-sky
surveys, but a north-south cylindrical antenna can cover the whole sky every 24
hours. For the same front-end cost, the
FOM for such a transit all-sky survey is an order of magnitude larger than for
a survey with a 64x64-element phased array.
The power gain
or directivity of an antenna is proportional to the effective area times the
square of the frequency of operation.
Increasing the directivity by a factor of 4 doubles the distance at
which a source with a given Effective Instantaneous Radiated Power EIRP can be
detected.
Within the
disk of the galaxy, the total number of stars is proportional to the cube of
the distance to furthest detectable civilisation. This drops to the square of the distance for distances exceeding
the thickness of the disk. It rises
rapidly again at a distance corresponding to the centre of the galaxy. At this last distance, the numbers lie on a
line formed by extrapolating the cube law relationship derived for the number
of stars at distances less than the thickness of the disk of the galaxy. Thus, a single cube law relationship holds
for all-sky surveys within the disk of the galaxy and for distances including
the centre of the galaxy.
Table 1 Relative antenna
performance for given EIRP
|
|
Reference antenna |
Larger antenna |
|
Effective Diameter |
1 |
d |
|
Frequency |
1 |
f |
|
Directivity |
1 |
(f.d)2 |
|
Maximum range |
1 |
f.d |
|
Stars/square degree |
n |
n.(f.d)3 |
No of square degrees
|
1 |
1/(
f.d)2 |
|
Total stars |
n |
n.(f.d) |
Where
f and d are frequency and effective diameter normalised to the frequency
and diameter of reference antenna and n is the number of stars per deg2
detectable by the reference antenna for a given EIRP at that star.

Increased
directivity reduces the beam area making the number of detectable stars
proportional f.d, the product of
frequency and diameter, instead of the cube of f.d. The relationships are
summarised in Table 1. The parameter f.d can be used as a Figure of Merit
(FOM) defining the effectiveness of a single antenna beam. This parameter can be expressed in a number
of different ways:
The
FOM of an antenna beam is also dependant on the Tsys of the antenna. Choosing area in metres2 and
wavelength in metres gives a quantitative FOM

As
an example, a 100m2 antenna with a Tsys of 25K has a has a FOM of 40
at a wavelength of 10cm.
An
all-sky phased-array survey from a single site can, in fact, only observe
sources within a large but limited declination range, and, for those sources,
observe them for a limited hour angle.
If the hour angle coverage is reduced all sources are still observed
every day but for a reduced amount of time.
In the limit, the instrument becomes a full declination transit
instrument, which leads to the conclusion.

Phased
Array and Cylindrical Reflector
with
Identical FOM at Transit
When
oriented NS a cylindrical reflector generates beams that are identical to the
transit beams of a phased array with the same length and effective width. The difference between the two is that full
electronic beamforming in the phased array has been replaced by reflector
beamforming in one direction. Used as a
transit instrument the cylindrical reflector is considerably cheaper than a
phased array because considerably fewer feeds, LNAs and front-end electronics
systems are needed. In addition, the
beamforming is cheaper. However, the
phased array can form many more beams, giving it, in principle, vastly superior
performance. For a valid comparison,
the front-end costs must be equalised.
If
a phased array has N x N feeds, then for an equivalent front-end
cost, a cylindrical reflector is N times longer with N2 feeds in the
line feed. This increases the number of
transit beams by N and reduces the declination beam width by N. Compared to the N element line feed, the
total FOM, summing over all beams, has increased by NÖN. This is a direct increase in FOM as the
source dwell time within a beam has not changed, thus maintaining sensitivity
for all detection modes.
For
the phased array full use of its capabilities is achieved by forming all
beams. Since the beam area increases
with zenith angle, the total number of beams is less than N2 and the
average FOM of each beam is less than that for the transit beams. Thus, forming all beams in a phased array
increases the total FOM by less than N when compared to just forming all the
transit beams. Therefore, for equal
numbers of feeds and effective widths we conclude:
